Free standard shipping on orders $200+Up to 30 kg · IBCs & bulk excluded

01 / Field results · Seasons 24–26

Real results,
measured in the paddock.

Replicated strip trials and on-farm records from Australian growers — control against treated, block by block. No drone glamour shots, just the numbers off the weighbridge.

04 trials published · 4 states · Untreated controls throughout

02 / How we trial

Design

Paired strips with an untreated control — same paddock, same season, same gear.

Measurement

Weighbridge yields, plant counts and third-party soil and tissue tests.

Reporting

Published as measured — including the seasons that miss.

$4,800

Net benefit per hectare

ControlTreated
100113LATE YIELD

Fig. 01 — Late yield indexed to the untreated control · Bioscience report, 28 March 2019

Trial 01 · Baldivis, WA · Carrots

Season 2019 · COMMERCIAL · 32.32°S 115.83°E

Carrots: biology out-earned a fumigant

A commercial carrot grower applied Bioprime at 50 L/ha and measured the result against the conventional program. Late yield rose 13%, worth $3,200/ha after the cost of product — and it displaced a metham sodium fumigation costing $1,600/ha.

+13%

Late yield increase

+$3,200/ha

Net benefit after cost

−$1,600/ha

Fumigant cost displaced

“The late yield increase of 13% in the 50 L/ha Bioprime treatment gives an increase of $3,200 per hectare after subtracting the cost of Bioprime. Considering the alternative cost of metham sodium at $1,600 per hectare, the net ROI increase was $4,800 per hectare.”

Bioscience trial report · Baldivis Farms · 28 March 2019
BioprimeSP · View formulation

+17%

Average across the programme

ControlTreated
100124FORRESTDALE100117PROGRAMME AVG100104MOORA (WMG)

Fig. 02 — Indexed yield vs untreated control · Moora result not statistically significant

Trial 02 · Moora & Buntine, WA · Wheat

Season 2012–2017 · 3 SITES · 30.64°S 116.00°E

Wheat: eight replicated trials, independently run

Eight replicated field trials across three Western Australian sites, contracted to independent trials group Living Farm, with the Liebe Group at Buntine and the West Midlands Group at Moora. Responses ranged from +4% to +24% depending on site, season and timing. We publish the inconclusive result alongside the rest.

+24%

Best single treatment

+17%

Programme average

+4% (n.s.)

Moora site average

“At the WMG, all Bioprime treatments had a positive effect on yield. Although not statistically significant, the average yield increase was 4%. At Forrestdale, foliar application resulted in a yield increase of 24%.”

Living Farm (independent contractor) · Trials for Bioscience · Liebe Group & West Midlands Group
BioprimeSP · View formulation

3 L/ha

Beat the 6 L/ha rate

ControlTreated
1001243 L/HA1001146 L/HA100114SEED TRT

Fig. 03 — Indexed yield by application rate · Proving That Bioprime Works, Feb 2017

Trial 03 · Multi-site, WA · Wheat

Season 2017 · MULTI-SITE · 31.95°S 115.86°E

Less product, more yield: the rate finding

Across the trial programme, the lower application rate out-performed the higher one: 3 L/ha returned +24% against +14% for 6 L/ha. Splitting the dose — 3 L/ha at two weeks, repeated at six — beat a single application again. Every seed-treated plot out-yielded its control.

+24%

3 L/ha response

+14%

6 L/ha response

+14%

Seed treatment plots

“The lower application rates of Bioprime (3 l/ha) produced the best yield with a 24% increase compared to 6 l/ha producing 14% increase. Double application produced a higher yield than a single application.”

Bioscience trial summary · Proving That Bioprime Works · February 2017
Bioprime Seed TreatmentST · View formulation

25% → 3%

Unmarketable produce

ControlTreated
1.813.0210 L/HA1.813.5120 L/HA

Fig. 04 — Marketable weight per bed · WO 2014/082130, Table 9

Trial 04 · Published patent data · Onions

Season Patent Table 9 · REPLICATED · WO 2014/082130

Onions: packout, not just tonnage

From the granted international patent, examined and public. Beds treated after sowing and again four weeks later produced markedly more marketable weight — and far less waste. Unmarketable produce fell from a quarter of the harvest to almost none.

+67%

Marketable weight, 10 L/ha

+94%

Marketable weight, 20 L/ha

25% → 3%

Unmarketable share

“In the untreated controls, 25% of the harvest was unmarketable because of small sized or misshaped bulbs, whereas losses in the treated groups were much lower at 3%.”

Granted patent · WO 2014/082130 · US 9,663,411 B2
BioprimeSP · View formulation

03 / Your paddock next

Want numbers like these off your own weighbridge?

Talk to our agronomists about building a biological program for your operation — trial strips and all.

Talk to an agronomistFind your solution